ein interessanter artikel zu den voraussetzungen dieser proteste in frankreich.
The government, in bad faith, sometimes boasts that the nominal budget for higher education rose from €13.3 billion to €15.5 billion between 2017 and 2026 (+17%). That is true, except that inflation over the same period was 22%, meaning the budget actually fell by 5% in real terms. Add to this that the number of students rose from 2.6 million to over 3 million, an increase of 15%. The result is that the budget per student dropped by about 20%,
bei den ganzen beschwerden über das bildungssstem in deutschland, seine zersplitterung durch die landeshoheit, zeigt sich, zentralistische systeme alleine sind nicht automatisch die lösung für unsere probleme; auch ein zentralistisches bildungssstem kann man verkacken, wenn man nur will
aber andererseits haben die franzosen wohl dasselbe problem wie wir hierzulande
To justify the inadequacy of education funding, and in particular the decrease in spending per student, the government and its supporters argue that France cannot afford to invest more. They are making two reasoning errors. Public debt has indeed risen from 20% of GDP in 1970 to 120% today. But at the same time, private wealth has grown much more dramatically: It has gone from 300% to 600% of GDP, with extreme concentration among the wealthiest financial fortunes. In other words, France’s national wealth – the sum of private and public assets minus private and public debts – has never been so high, not only in absolute terms but also as a percentage of GDP (which itself has never been higher).
In other words, France has never been richer. The problem to solve is simply one of distribution.
es gilt also auch fĂĽr frankreich das diktum heiner geiĂźlers:
«Wir haben Geld wie Dreck. Es haben nur die falschen Leute.»
https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/124473/04-09-2015/geissler-wir-haben-geld-wie-dreck#frankreich #proteste #wirtschaft #bildung #HeinerGeiĂźler #politik
