US Federal Cyber Experts Thought Microsoft’s Cloud Was Garbage — They Approved It Anyway
“The government relies, in part, on third-party firms to vet cloud technology, but those firms are hired and paid by the company being assessed. The tech giant’s ‘lack of proper detailed security documentation’ left reviewers with a ‘lack of confidence in assessing the system’s overall security posture,’ according to an internal government report reviewed by ProPublica. Or, as one member of the team put it: ‘The package is a pile of shit.’”
Not only are many countries outside the USA very worried about potential access by the US NSA and others to their sovereign data, but even the US federal government is just as worried about the security of their own data in the Microsoft Cloud. Yet Microsoft sees no slowdown in terms of cloud adoption, probably tanks to wonderful marketing and other economic leverage that is applied worldwide.
One can also now realise why the term Microslop is taking hold so effectively in 2026.
It is all our own faults though as there are truly reasonably good alternatives to Microsoft's cloud. It is just a matter of also separating the glosssy marketing wants versus the real needs for document management. As I pointed out in another post earlier in the week, we do not all have to be on the same brand of document software to exchange documents (just think of different e-mail providers like Proton, GMail, Zoho, Outlook, and many more all talking together).
It's up to us if we want to see change.
See
Federal Cyber Experts Thought Microsoft’s Cloud Was Garbage. They Approved It Anyway.
The government relies, in part, on third-party firms to vet cloud technology, but those firms are hired and paid by the company being assessed.
#
technology #
microslop #
security #
USA
