The integrative research review addresses the topic of how the usage of mobile and tablet health-related applications by the adolescents improved the management of their long-term health conditions. Medical scientists have recently defined a shift from acute disorders of adolescents to their chronic conditions. Potential individual research reports were identified on the basis of the fact that “utilizing modern mobile electronic technologies in health interventions for young people may be a suitable way to address self, shared, or joint care in a manner that is resource efficient”.
Not all studies were included in the analysis and the inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) population (adolescents aged 10-24 years, diagnosed with chronic states); (2) intervention (any app that could be considered a management intervention); (3) terms of content and delivery; (4) comparisons (interventions versus usual care or different variants of interventions); (5) any kind of outcomes; (6) a suitable study design. The reviewers initially determined nineteen papers as potentially eligible for inclusion, but as a result of their final investigation only four full texts were included.
The research designs of the selected studies were integrative and included determining the exact purposes of each app and its functions. All the texts were evaluated according to the following criteria: selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection method, withdrawals and dropouts. The consistent and important across-studies conclusions included the fact that though there is a great number of existing mobile and tab health management apps, the evidence based on the results of their usage is limited.
The topic of the article is clearly defined and developed. There is a description of the methods used to conduct the review the statistical data presented by the authors were analyzed with the help of a parameter of standard deviation, theoretical basis, connection with the reality and many others.The research for study reports was comprehensive and individual peculiarities of each study were taken into consideration. The studies were included in the review assessed for quality, following the six criteria, mentioned above.
The design characteristics were discussed in sufficient details in order for the readers to see all perspectives considered by the review. It is possible to state that the article is characterized by the integration of findings and comparison of all the considered texts, because they analyzed different health conditions. Some different findings were found between the studies and the reviewers explored why this occurred. Mainly different purposes of the application usage could be the reason of this fact.
The reviewers do not have a chance to distinguish between the conclusions, which are based on consistent findings from a sufficient number of studies and those based on inferior evidence, because they confess that there are very few evidence-based conclusions in general compared to the number of health-related apps. Consistent findings supported by two or more studies were the facts that adolescents were engaged in designing mobile applications, but were not equally contributing partners in the entire development and implementation of the applications.
The conclusions of the article are credible, because the authors conducted four investigations and properly analyzed them, summarizing the findings. Integrative research reviews are very helpful in finding evidence about clinical practice problems. They give a researcher a chance to examine several investigations as well as to analyze and compare them. I am sure that this approach is the right practice, which can be used in my own clinical practice setting. Due to this strategy I will have a chance not only to compare the works of different researchers but also to match the results of the investigations with the real situation concerning certain phenomena.
This material was provided by Kyle Mitchel who is a native essay writers
https://topwritingservice.com/our-writers/