{"type":"rich","html":"<div style=\"width: 640; height: 426; font-family: sans-serif,arial,freesans;\" ><div id=\"shared_container_1148319906\" class=\"shared_container\"><div id=\"shared_header_1148319906\" class=\"shared_header\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pluspora.com\/u\/robm71\"><img src=\"https:\/\/hub.netzgemeinde.eu\/photo\/c18a91fb-c2b0-410d-8558-e60688304fd9-6\" alt=\"Roberto Maurizzi\" height=\"32\" width=\"32\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/a><span><a href=\"https:\/\/pluspora.com\/u\/robm71\">Roberto Maurizzi<\/a>  wrote the following  <a href=\"https:\/\/hub.netzgemeinde.eu\/display\/95878cf0591601374587005056264835\">Beitrag <\/a><span class=\"autotime\" title=\"2019-05-15T10:08:45+02:00\">Wed, 15 May 2019 10:08:45 +0200<\/span><\/span><\/div><div id=\"reshared-content-1148319906\" class=\"reshared-content\">If you know and can tell me which application engine they're using, assuming it's not a super-proprietary thing with paywalled docs, I'm sure we can find a documentation page that shows how to configure the queries to avoid &quot;death by LIMIT .... OFFSET ...&quot; so then you can stick it in their faces :D That said, as Jason Spieker said, I find it really strange that the RDBMS didn't &quot;get&quot; that it's only going to use 20 records linked to the first 20 records of the s_user table and limited the temp table building to those records only...<\/div><\/div><br \/><\/div>","width":640,"height":426}