{"type":"rich","html":"<div style=\"width: 640; height: 426; font-family: sans-serif,arial,freesans;\" ><div id=\"shared_container_1984417069\" class=\"shared_container\"><div id=\"shared_header_1984417069\" class=\"shared_header\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pluspora.com\/u\/jochen\"><img src=\"https:\/\/hub.netzgemeinde.eu\/photo\/08cd1e575cdbc0f88cb0ca03e04091e9-6\" alt=\"Jochen Spieker\" height=\"32\" width=\"32\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/a><span><a href=\"https:\/\/pluspora.com\/u\/jochen\">Jochen Spieker<\/a>  wrote the following  <a href=\"https:\/\/hub.netzgemeinde.eu\/display\/3cc900d0586501374574005056264835\">Beitrag <\/a><span class=\"autotime\" title=\"2019-05-14T12:59:15+02:00\">Tue, 14 May 2019 12:59:15 +0200<\/span><\/span><\/div><div id=\"reshared-content-1984417069\" class=\"reshared-content\">I don't think there is anything wrong with this statement. Of course, the dev should have made sure that the schema is prepared for these joins. Given the right indexes, and database should be able to deliver a result in very few milliseconds.<\/div><\/div><br \/><\/div>","width":640,"height":426}